Your post count prohibits you from posting new replies in this forum!
Users with less than 1 posts cannot reply to threads here. Your post count is currently . You need to post first in the Intro thread.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Thread: EA anunta Battlefield: Bad Company 2

  1. #21 SP
    is the man! trickz's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by paul View Post
    Pentru ca nu este.
    Am subliniat in primul quote care era ideea... de ce ceream trailerul de bad company 2.

  2. #22 SP
    Manager paul's Avatar
    Ok, dar degeaba ceri pentru ca nu este niciun trailer.

  3. #23 SP
    Member ciypriyan's Avatar
    thanx 4 teh new

  4. #24 SP
    Senior Member erik95's Avatar
    Cred ca va fi un joc bun

  5. #25 SP
    Senior Member eXist's Avatar
    Bad Company 2 Hits This Winter, Battlefield 1943 This Summer ... Am făcut eu o mică confuzie acolo ... apropos de Teaser.

  6. #26 SP
    Senior Member TiBiKiMiR's Avatar
    Eeeee...asta cred ca e cea mai frumoasa stire pt fiu-meu (DeianD)...lui ii place tare mult BC (e jocul lui preferat) ...cred ca de acum o sa stea ca pe ace pana in 2010

  7. #27 SP
    Member DeianD's Avatar
    Abia astept sa apara jocul !!! O sa incerc sa il cumpar cat pot de repede dupa ce apare !

  8. #28 SP
    Max
    Member Max's Avatar

  9. #29 SP
    Senior Member erik95's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Max View Post
    Ce tampenie. Unlimited Ammo si mai putine clase

  10. #30 SP
    Member canibalu's Avatar

  11. #31 SP
    Max
    Member Max's Avatar
    Battlefield 1943 gets dumbed down because of consoles

    Simple answer: because of consoles. Long answer, courtesy of 1943 programmer Gustav Halling: because of consoles' bandwidth limits, and inability to process network data in a speedy manner:

    64 players are of course awesome but will all good there is some hurting also. I can assure you that the 24 player limit is not about us being lazy but the experience of a massive battlefield is not bound to the amount of players! And as many of you remember most clan wars where player with 8vs8 or 12vs12 and what we have seen many of the 64-player servers are mostly half-full or having lack of performance.

    We have made it sure that Battlefield 1943 will feel big and have a fast pacing, bf1942 actually had very low pacing! If you place 100 people in one room it feels very small, but if you put 100 people on the streets it seems like nothing! 24 players will give us the benefit of having full servers almost all the time and the whole map area is being used!

    Beside these design decisions there are technical limitations. There are very restricted bandwidth limits on the consoles and we are networking a lot more then 24 players:

    # 24 players are networked
    # Almost as many physics driven vehicles with movable and destroyable parts
    # All destruction, if a wall is being destroyed on one client we need to update it on all the others, otherwise we could end up with players hiding behind non-existent walls.

    If we did remove all destruction and all our vehicles we could have more players. But no other game gives you the wide gaming experience we have!
    Battlefield 1943: Why The 24-Player Limit? - Voodoo Extreme

    Macar sunt sinceri..

Your post count prohibits you from posting new replies in this forum!
Users with less than 1 posts cannot reply to threads here. Your post count is currently . You need to post first in the Intro thread.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts