Asta e clar ca au incalcat contractul. Au facut-o deliberat si cu show. Nu asta e esentialul.

Procesul e pentru monopol, practici necompetitionale si altele:
COUNT 1: Sherman Act § 2 (Unlawful Monopoly Maintenance in the iOS App Distribution Market)
COUNT 2: Sherman Act § 2 (Denial of Essential Facility in the iOS App Distribution Market)
COUNT 3: Sherman Act § 1 (Unreasonable Restraints of Trade in the iOS App Distribution Market)
COUNT 4: Sherman Act § 2 (Unlawful Monopoly Maintenance in the iOS In-App Payment Processing Market)
COUNT 5: Sherman Act § 1 (Unreasonable Restraints of Trade in the iOS In-App Payment Processing Market)
COUNT 6: Sherman Act § 1 (Tying the App Store in the iOS App Distribution Market to In-App Purchase in the iOS In-App Payment Processing Market)
COUNT 7: California Cartwright Act (Unreasonable Restraints of Trade in the iOS App Distribution Market)
COUNT 8: California Cartwright Act (Unreasonable Restraints of Trade in the iOS In-App Payment Processing Market)
COUNT 9: California Cartwright Act (Tying the App Store in the iOS App Distribution Market to In-App Purchase in the iOS In-App Payment Processing Market)
COUNT 10: California Unfair Competition Law
Acuzatiile astea sunt valabile si pentru alte companii (Amazon, Facebook, Google etc.).

Nici eu nu cred ca o sa castige. Singura solutie ramane sa vina de la Congres.