Nu e chiar asa. Situatiile sunt diferite.

Nu am apucat sa citesc detalii de la proces, dar google are parteneriate cu diversi producatori si practic inclusiv acolo detine monopol.
E ciudat pentru ca in verdict zic de monopol si tot acolo zic ca de fapt sunt in competitie cu Apple in piata de smartphone OS.

Si da, pare o contradictie dar nu este.

Situatia a fost asa - la Apple, Epic au gresit primii pt ca au incalcat termenii, daca stii lansasera atunci o versiune cu payment service - pe cand la Google, Epic nu au gresit, Google au fost prinsi ca au sters documente si ca au facut deal-uri secrete pt a limita competing stores.

Uite ce explica cineva in comentarii:
So the cases looked similar, but were actually very different, By virtue of not having to do anything because of its closed ecosystem (Apple didn't need to bribe third party app stores, it simply wasn't possible to install them), Apple didn't nothing wrong. By contrast, Google claimed you could do something like access different app stores, but went about everybody's backs to deny them that choice. It's like claiming you are a democracy, but going out of your way to rig the elections.