Clubul PlayStation Vita - PS Vita

[DeathOfArt]

frumos. merita

[Templier]

cine mai are nevoie de ajutor pt trofee imi da un semn

[Templier]

Fans of the PlayStation Vita had better hold on to their units.

Shuhei Yoshida, the worldwide studios chief for Sony Computer Entertainment, told a panel this weekend that "the climate is not healthy" for a successor to the PlayStation handheld, thanks to the saturation of mobile gaming-ready devices and the nature of the games they play.

"People have mobile phones and it's so easy to play games on smartphones," Yoshida told EGX 2015, noting many games are free-to-play. "Touch-based games are fun ... but having sticks and buttons make things totally different."

The PlayStation Vita launched in late 2011 in Japan, then in the west in early 2012. A redesigned "slim" form was introduced in 2014, but the Vita's greatest sales performance and diversity of titles offered is in Japan, though it has been a reliable extension of PlayStation's overall focus on independent games.

SOURCE Eurogamer

[marv]

sunt curios ce parere au cei de la Nintendo despre asta. Pe ei nu-i prea vad sa fie ingrijorati de jocurile pe telefon.

[Templier]

atata timp cat poti sa joci Mario si Zelda numai pe 3DS nu cred ca ar avea aceeasi mentalitate

[marv]

acelasi lucru il putem zice despre Uncharted: Golden Abyss, Dragon's Crown, Soul Sacrifice, etc pe Vita. Mi se pare ca nu au incercat destul. Fanii au cerut insistent titluri AAA pe Vita, dar ei au incercat sa-l faca un indie device (in afara Japoniei). Desi sunt foarte multe indie-uri reusite e nevoie si de software dedicat care sa se foloseasca de toate specificatiile consolei. Doar cu o librarie de jocuri exclusiviste se creeaza si pastreaza o comunitate fidela in jurul unei console.

[Templier]

corect numai ca Nintendo a " spalate " creierii oamenilor ani de zile cu Mario si Zelda ajungand astfel sa fie cumparate din impuls jocurile aste pe cand la Vita GoW si U nu au prins asa de mult. Sony mereu a vrut calitate superioara pe cand Nintendo s-a axat pe cantitate

[Espiritus]

Nu poti spune GoW si calitate in aceeasi fraza cand vorbesti de PS Vita. Portul a fost o bataie de joc.

[BlackSnake]

Eu zic ca e invers. Prefer putinele jocuri scoase de nintendo first party plus inca cateva de la alti publisheri japonezi care stiu ca sunt bune, decat sutele de indies si porturi proaste de jocuri de pe ps2 si ps3 pe vita. Ultimul joc bun pe vita care nu e indie sau port de pe alta platforma a fost killzone mercenary in 2013. Au ratat sansa cu Golden Abyss 2 (cancelled), Infamous (cancelled) si Gravity Rush 2 (ps4).

[Templier]

I have long been a fan of the PlayStation Vita. So this quote from one of Sony’s head honchos about portable gaming seriously bums me out.

Here’s Shuhei Yoshida at a recent Q&A, as transcribed by Eurogamer, when asked if Sony will ever develop a Vita successor:

“That’s a tough question. People have mobile phones and it’s so easy to play games on smartphones. And many games on smartphones are free, or free to start. I myself am a huge fan of PlayStation Vita and we worked really hard on designing every aspect. Touch-based games are fun - there are many games with really good design. But having sticks and buttons make things totally different. So I hope, like many of you, that this culture of playing portable games continues but the climate is not healthy for now because of the huge dominance of mobile gaming.”

This is nonsense. The climate is fine. Nintendo has sold over 50 million 3DSes and they don’t even have Minecraft. There’s no doubt that mobile gaming has had a huge impact on the traditional video game industry, but when it comes to the Vita flopping, Sony has nobody but themselves to blame.

Here is a partial list of reasons the Vita has failed:

Sony decided to gouge customers by forcing them to use proprietary memory cards, then jacking up the prices to obscene levels. (A 32GB Vita memory card retails for $100; standard 32GB SDHC memory cards cost $18.)
Sony marketed the Vita as a portable system with “console-quality gaming,” then went on to pack it with shoddy spinoffs like Uncharted: Golden Abyss, Call of Duty: Declassified, and Resistance: Burning Skies.
Despite all this, a subset of hardcore gamers quickly realized that the Vita was a fantastic machine for indies and niche Japanese games. So what did Sony do? They decided to start marketing it as a portable accessory to the PS4—as if anyone would dish out an extra $250 to play Destiny on the toilet.
Vita owners also realized that the machine is fantastic for playing old PS1 and PSP games. Sony saw how much money they could make there, and they immediately filled out the PlayStation Store, pleasing fans with truckloads of classic new games every week. Just kidding. They ignored it. Even today you need to use a silly shortcut just to get some old games working on your Vita.
Remember the PS2? One of the most successful video game consoles in history? Chock full of great games that could be ported to the Vita in various ways? Someone should remind Sony of that.
Remember BioShock Vita? lmao
Sony has pretty much spent the past two years pretending the Vita doesn’t exist, ignoring it at every major trade show and convention. It’s embarrassing.
Remember when the 3DS launched back in 2011? Remember how hard it flopped? Instead of pulling back and blaming the “climate” for all of their woes, Nintendo doubled down, releasing new models and filling it up with stellar games to the point where it’s now one of the best machines you can buy. Granted, Sony doesn’t have Mario or Zelda or the storied development acumen of their competitors in Kyoto. But if they hadn’t spent the past three and a half years firing a giant rifle at their own feet, maybe things would look a little different for the wonderful PlayStation Vita.

[Prototype93D]

Ma gandesc sa imi cumpar un PS Vita, dar am urmatoarea intrebare: Care model se merita sa-l cumpar? 1000 sau 2000?
Diferentele in mare parte le stiu:
1. 1000 - ecran OLED; 2000 - ecran LCD
2. 2000 vine cu 1GB memorie
3. 2000 e mai subtire si mai usor
4. 2000 are un port USB
5. 2000 are autonomia bateriei cu o ora mai mult
6. 2000 are o problema ca nu se poate da luminozitatea la maxim in timpul jocurilor (sau cel putin asa am inteles eu din ce a postat lumea pe forum)
Vreau sa stiu daca pot copia poze, melodii, videoclipuri de pe PC pe PS Vita prin USB fara sa folosesc vreun program anume (am gasit pe forum ca trebuie sa instalezi un program pe PC .....etc, adica nu e la fel de usor ca la PSP)
Cam astea sunt diferentele pe care le stiu eu. Daca mai stiti si altele sau ce probleme are fiecare model nu ezitati sa le scrieti.

[BlackSnake]

1.Eu prefer Oled fata de LCD. Daca ai un telefon cu ecran amoled stii despre ce vorbesc. Se vede clar diferenta intre oled si lcd.
2.Memoria de 1gb e inutila daca o sa cumperi card pentru Vita si cumperi jocuri digitale. E valabila doar daca o sa joci numai jocuri fizice si iti salveaza pe memoria interna de 1gb.
3.Nu cred ca e asa mare diferenta. Vita 1000 mi se pare perfect facut.
4.Asta e un plus.
5.Are autonomia din cauza ecranului mai mult ca sigur.
6.N-am auzit de problema asta. Pe Vita 1000 merge luminozitatea la maxim.
Pentru poze,melodii, etc trebuie sa folosesti Content Manager. Nu recunoaste direct ca un removable drive sa poti sa muti ce vrei pe memorie.
Installing Content Manager Assistant | PlayStation�Vita User's Guide

[rockybt18]

+1 pentru Vita 1000. Detin unul si ecranul OLED face toti banii. Cauta un bundle nou Vita 1000 cu card 4gb si 1 joc ceva. Merita mai mult fata de 2000.

[Prototype93D]

Am vazut ca are la Altex PS Vita 1000. Card de memorie o sa iau unu de 16GB (nu prea mai gasesc in magazine jocurile pe care mi le doream asa ca o sa iau o parte din ele in format digital)

[rockybt18]

Cu rabdare gasesti jocuri preferate pe aria bazar la preturi sub cele de pe store si ai avantajul de a le avea in format fizic.

[BlackSnake]

Incearca pe bazar sau olx. Sunt cativa care vand jocuri fizice de vita.

[Prototype93D]

O sa vad in momentul in care o sa cumpar consola. Oricum, pe cele care ocupa in jur de 1-1.5GB le iau digital. Nu vreau sa stau apoi sa scot mereu jocurile din consola si apoi sa bag altele (ma refer la cele fizice).

[Templier]

Ma gandesc sa imi cumpar un PS Vita, dar am urmatoarea intrebare: Care model se merita sa-l cumpar? 1000 sau 2000?
Diferentele in mare parte le stiu:
1. 1000 - ecran OLED; 2000 - ecran LCD
2. 2000 vine cu 1GB memorie
3. 2000 e mai subtire si mai usor
4. 2000 are un port USB
5. 2000 are autonomia bateriei cu o ora mai mult
6. 2000 are o problema ca nu se poate da luminozitatea la maxim in timpul jocurilor (sau cel putin asa am inteles eu din ce a postat lumea pe forum)
Vreau sa stiu daca pot copia poze, melodii, videoclipuri de pe PC pe PS Vita prin USB fara sa folosesc vreun program anume (am gasit pe forum ca trebuie sa instalezi un program pe PC .....etc, adica nu e la fel de usor ca la PSP)
Cam astea sunt diferentele pe care le stiu eu. Daca mai stiti si altele sau ce probleme are fiecare model nu ezitati sa le scrieti.

depinde de ce vrei sa iti cumperi unul?
daca vrei de colectie - ambele
pt a te juca ocazional - 2000
pt a-l pastra - 1000

poti sa iti cumperi in functie de pret, cel mai ieftin pe care il gasesti

[Harkonnen]

Eu am 2004 si nu am probleme. Rup MKX pe el. Borderlands, am incercat si un rally deci e ok. Nu am timp mult sa joc si pe ps4 si pe vita. Dar iau tot de la monthly games de ps plus

[rodarkone]

Eu iti recomand sa iei varianta 1000 - este din ce in ce mai rara ... apoi daca nu-ti place, iei varianta 2000 care se gaseste in orice magazin.